Tag Archive for 'bush'

20OctUS military Policing of Space for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of America

MySpace!

US President George “Nucular” Bush has signed a document stating the US has a right to block nations it deems “evil” and “rogue” or “not willing to allow us to exploit their resources” from going to space.

The document (declassified content of which can be viewed herepdf) indicates future plans of future US administrations to blackmail and threaten other nations using access from and weapons stationed in space.

Quote:

In this new century, those who effectively utilize space will enjoy added prosperity and security and will hold a substantial advantage over those who do not. Freedom of action in space is as
important to the United States as air power and sea power. In order to increase knowledge, discovery, economic prosperity, and to enhance the national security, the United States must have robust, effective, and efficient space capabilities.

It goes on to state:

The fundamental goals of this policy are to:

  • Strengthen the nation’s space leadership and ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further U.S. national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives;
  • Enable unhindered U.S. operations in and through space to defend our interests there;
  • Implement and sustain an innovative human and robotic exploration program with the objective of extending human presence across the solar system;
  • Increase the benefits of civil exploration, scientific discovery, and environmental activities;
  • Enable a dynamic, globally competitive domestic commercial space sector in order to promote innovation, strengthen U.S. leadership, and protect national, homeland, and economic security;
  • Enable a robust science and technology base supporting national security, homeland security, and civil space activities; and
  • Encourage international cooperation with foreign nations and/or consortia on space activities that are of mutual benefit and that further the peaceful exploration and use of space, as well as to advance national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives.

US stakes claim on space

By Lucy Sherriff

The US has claimed “dibs” on the Universe with its new space policy. The document, signed by President Bush, was released on a Friday, just before a long weekend in the States. This, in itself has caused a bit of a stir, but not more so than the tone and content of the document.

In it, the US government allocates itself rights to access and use space without anyone else getting in its way. It also sets security at the heart of the space agenda, frequently citing its right to use space as part of its national defence.

Significantly, however, it does not commit to restrict, or even to join talks about restricting the development of space-based weapons. This is despite a UN vote last year in which 160 nations voted in favor of such talks.

The first bullet point outlining the principles of the programme sets the tone for the rest of the document:

“The United States is committed to the exploration and use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes, and for the benefit of all humanity. Consistent with this principle, ‘peaceful purposes’ allow US defence and intelligence-related activities in pursuit of national interests.”

In other words: “Everyone has to use space peacefully, except us. We can do what we like, cos we were here first(*). And anyway, if you try to stop us, it won’t stay peaceful for long, which would spoil the first part of our principle.”

The document then warms to its military theme. The first fundamental goal of the programme is not given as being to explore the solar system or better understand the Universe, but:

“To strengthen the nation’s space leadership and ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further US national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives.”

In keeping with this goal, the policy also confirms the Bush administration’s abandonment of robotic space exploration of the solar system, in favour of manned exploration of the moon, and Mars. This approach is much more glamorous and exciting for Joe Public, true, but critics argue quite convincingly that it is much more expensive and scientifically less valuable.

International cooperation is not overlooked, but again the emphasis is on security. The US, the document says, might be happy to cooperate internationally on “providing space surveillance information consistent with security requirements and US national security and foreign policy interests”.

Oh and “space exploration” too. Phew.

25SepPeople from all over America welcoming Anousheh Ansari to the ISS

azadnia wrote:
wow this is amazing… bush is affraid of nuclear iran, but now we have an iranian, muslem woman in space… lol… awesome!

LordBison wrote:
Yeah really. I wonder if she passed the Frisking Stage to see if she had any bombs on her before she boarded the Rocket.

skot66 wrote:
that is scary in itself. . . get of my damn space station. Iranians have no place in space.

Xombium wrote:
AN Iranian in space, what did Iranians contibute to space technology? A heroine? Absolutely not. It is a gift from advanced nations that she got up there. Iranian poeple will only conquer one thing, there own nation of Iran, because so far it is ruled by a dictator. Sorena, you need to go back to school!

x80568056 wrote:
what did the arabs do to you?? all the hard core terrorists come from persia ok which is iran.

chrislksrockets wrote:
Yeah, I hope they don’t send any more Persians though. Don’t want the spacecraft smelling like shit.

larissanorge wrote:
well, actually this is quite ironic…because she iranian, and of course she didnt earned that money by herself! she is a heiress, just like fucking Paris Hilton if you will.

Ah, the smell of Germany in the 30’s.

25SepCollateral Damage 1: Embryos and Stem Cell Research

By Richard Dawkins

stem cells

George Bush has just vetoed a bill, approved by both Houses of Congress, which would have allowed federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Apparently the President’s ethical philosophy places a higher value on American embryos than on Iraqi or Lebanese men, women and children. Don’t misunderstand ‘embryos’, by the way. We are not talking miniature babies here. The ‘embryos’; used for stem cell research are no bigger than a pinhead, and completely lacking in sentience of any kind.The illogical and hypocritical inconsistency between Bush’s stance on embryonic stem cell research on the one hand, and on slaughtered and maimed Iraqis and Lebanese on the other, is the subject of this article. It is an inconsistency that you could find only in a mind massively infected with the disease of religion.

19SepGoogle forms political action committee

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6116980.html

Just in time for the November elections, Google has made a strategic move already familiar to fellow technology heavyweights seeking to wield influence inside the Beltway.

The Mountain View, Calif.-based search giant confirmed Monday that it filed the federal paperwork necessary to set up a political action committee, or PAC, an organization designed expressly to raise money for political candidates and causes.

The top priority for Google NetPAC, as the company has named it, will be swaying “critical decisions affecting Internet freedom, innovation, and competition,” said Alan Davidson, Google’s Washington policy counsel.

“It’s simply a part of our company’s steadily increasing involvement in national and global policy issues,” Davidson added in an e-mail interview.

The company began stepping up those efforts last year when it hired Davidson, formerly of the Center for Democracy and Technology advocacy group, to launch a Washington-based policy shop. Since then, it has added Jamie Brown, a former White House aide under President Bush, and continues to employ outside lobbying firms.

The San Francisco Chronicle first reported the creation of Google’s PAC on Saturday.

Google’s widening foray into the policy sphere is hardly novel among tech companies of its size and stature. As previously reported by CNET News.com, contributions by technology companies have grown since the late 1990s, and many major corporations–including Microsoft, Intel and Oracle–already count PAC donations as part of their political strategy. Not all, however, subscribe to the idea. IBM and Apple Computer are among the large firms that have refrained from forming PACs so far.

In recent months, Google has found itself the subject of scrutiny by U.S. politicians and bureaucrats. It joined Microsoft, Yahoo and Cisco Systems at a well-publicized February hearing in which a House of Representatives panel lashed out at the companies’ alleged compliance with the Chinese government’s censorship regime.

The company has also been at the forefront of the Net neutrality debate, an issue that has divided politicos mostly along party lines and now threatens to derail a larger communications bill pending in the Senate. Google maintains that without stringent Net neutrality regulations, the Internet will cease to be a consumer-friendly, user-driven environment.

“Google NetPAC will support officeholders and candidates who share Google’s goal of preserving and promoting the Internet as a free and open platform for information, communication, and innovation,” Davidson said.




flickr stream

Drone 2 - blurryDrone 2California ufo / drone20012008046california ufo / drone (raw picture) 3California ufo / dronecalifornia ufo / drone (raw picture) 5California ufo / drone (taken  at Lake Tahoe using camera phone) 1

Random Gallery Image

Lingerie Models Pond at MesseTurm Behind the playing field On The Water on Lake Ontario Kenneth with the cat K2 Top A future tree Collage

Most Recent

lego-mohammed.jpg mbaside.jpg macessity-laptop-stand.jpg macessity-laptop-stand-messy.jpg

Calendar

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr «-»  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031