Archive for the 'I Hate Bushes' Category

17NovPolice State comes to campus

Written by Felicia Williams

Lawyer: U.S. student hit by stun gun thought officer was racial profiling

LOS ANGELES: A video of a UCLA officer using a Taser on a student was uploaded to YouTube yesterday. This is the third videotape of a Los Angeles police incident that involves “excessive force” to surface in the past week.

Technology is watching and spreading the news. With video cameras being built into cell phones and still cameras, a new surge in citizen journalism continues to gain momentum. Once a novelty feature, cell phone video is quickly becoming a valuable tool for capturing political inequities. This week, LA police officers thrice became the subjects of this guerilla video-journalism, which has exposed their brutality in situations portrayed as seemingly unprovoked.

When Mostafa Tabatabainejad, 23, refused to provide his ID to the community service officer, he was asked to leave. Refusing to comply with the random ID check, Tabatabainejad was asked to leave “multiple times” before the campus police were called in.

Despite the UCLA police report that said “the officers attempted to escort him out, he went limp and continued to refuse to cooperate with officers or leave the building,” witnesses defend their fellow student and argue there was no resistance. And when campus police arrived, Tabatabainejad had begun to “walk toward the door with his backpack”.

This video, shot from a student’s camera phone, shows part of the Tabatabainejad’s struggle and has clear audio of the student yelling, “Here’s your Patriot Act, here’s your fucking abuse of power,” while he struggled with the officers.

“It was beyond grotesque,” said a witness who was quoted in the LA Times. “By the end they took him over the stairs, lifted him up and Tasered him on his rear end. It seemed like it was inappropriately placed. The Tasering was so unnecessary and they just kept doing it.”

While this video is disturbing, it can’t be denied that captures such as this are an exciting reverse-Orwellian act of citizen’s response. Upholders of the Second Amendment insist that we keep guns to protect ourselves from our government, maybe now all we need is a cell phone.

20OctUS military Policing of Space for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of America

MySpace!

US President George “Nucular” Bush has signed a document stating the US has a right to block nations it deems “evil” and “rogue” or “not willing to allow us to exploit their resources” from going to space.

The document (declassified content of which can be viewed herepdf) indicates future plans of future US administrations to blackmail and threaten other nations using access from and weapons stationed in space.

Quote:

In this new century, those who effectively utilize space will enjoy added prosperity and security and will hold a substantial advantage over those who do not. Freedom of action in space is as
important to the United States as air power and sea power. In order to increase knowledge, discovery, economic prosperity, and to enhance the national security, the United States must have robust, effective, and efficient space capabilities.

It goes on to state:

The fundamental goals of this policy are to:

  • Strengthen the nation’s space leadership and ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further U.S. national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives;
  • Enable unhindered U.S. operations in and through space to defend our interests there;
  • Implement and sustain an innovative human and robotic exploration program with the objective of extending human presence across the solar system;
  • Increase the benefits of civil exploration, scientific discovery, and environmental activities;
  • Enable a dynamic, globally competitive domestic commercial space sector in order to promote innovation, strengthen U.S. leadership, and protect national, homeland, and economic security;
  • Enable a robust science and technology base supporting national security, homeland security, and civil space activities; and
  • Encourage international cooperation with foreign nations and/or consortia on space activities that are of mutual benefit and that further the peaceful exploration and use of space, as well as to advance national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives.

US stakes claim on space

By Lucy Sherriff

The US has claimed “dibs” on the Universe with its new space policy. The document, signed by President Bush, was released on a Friday, just before a long weekend in the States. This, in itself has caused a bit of a stir, but not more so than the tone and content of the document.

In it, the US government allocates itself rights to access and use space without anyone else getting in its way. It also sets security at the heart of the space agenda, frequently citing its right to use space as part of its national defence.

Significantly, however, it does not commit to restrict, or even to join talks about restricting the development of space-based weapons. This is despite a UN vote last year in which 160 nations voted in favor of such talks.

The first bullet point outlining the principles of the programme sets the tone for the rest of the document:

“The United States is committed to the exploration and use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes, and for the benefit of all humanity. Consistent with this principle, ‘peaceful purposes’ allow US defence and intelligence-related activities in pursuit of national interests.”

In other words: “Everyone has to use space peacefully, except us. We can do what we like, cos we were here first(*). And anyway, if you try to stop us, it won’t stay peaceful for long, which would spoil the first part of our principle.”

The document then warms to its military theme. The first fundamental goal of the programme is not given as being to explore the solar system or better understand the Universe, but:

“To strengthen the nation’s space leadership and ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further US national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives.”

In keeping with this goal, the policy also confirms the Bush administration’s abandonment of robotic space exploration of the solar system, in favour of manned exploration of the moon, and Mars. This approach is much more glamorous and exciting for Joe Public, true, but critics argue quite convincingly that it is much more expensive and scientifically less valuable.

International cooperation is not overlooked, but again the emphasis is on security. The US, the document says, might be happy to cooperate internationally on “providing space surveillance information consistent with security requirements and US national security and foreign policy interests”.

Oh and “space exploration” too. Phew.

11OctStudy: Iraqi bodycount now at 600,000 / 655,000

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A team of U.S. and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that more than 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 U.S. invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

The figure breaks down to about 15,000 violent deaths a month, a number that is quadruple the one for July given by Iraqi government hospitals and the morgue in Baghdad and published last month in a U.N. report in Iraq. That month was the highest for Iraqi civilian deaths since the U.S. invasion.

But it is an estimate and not a precise count, and researchers acknowledged a margin of error that ranged from 426,369 to 793,663 deaths.

It is the second study by researchers from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. It uses samples of casualties from Iraqi households to extrapolate an overall figure of 601,027 Iraqis dead from violence between March 2003 and July 2006.

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_4472925
655,000

11OctRumsfeld’s f-ups come back to haunt him (again)

After selling nerve gas to Saddam Hussein in the 80’s, it seems like Donald Rumsfeld was also involved in selling Nuclear Technology to North Korea.

Rumsfeld was a non-executive director of ABB, a European engineering giant based in Zurich, when it won a $200m contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. The current defense secretary sat on the board from 1990 to 2001, earning $190,000 a year.

ABB spokesman Bjoern Edlund told Fortune magazine at the time that “board members were informed about this project.”“This was a major thing for ABB,” the former director [who sat on the board with Rumsfeld] said, “and extensive political lobbying was done.” The director recalls being told that Rumsfeld was asked “to lobby in Washington” on ABB’s behalf. …Although he couldn’t provide details, Goran Lundberg, who ran ABB’s power-generation business until 1995, says he’s “pretty sure that at some point Don was involved,” since it was not unusual to seek help from board members “when we needed contacts with the U.S. government.”

Rest of this story…




flickr stream

California ufo / droneCalifornia ufo / drone 3Drone 2 - blurryObama/clintoncalifornia ufo / drone (raw picture) 526022008075california ufo / drone (raw picture) 3California ufo / drone 4

Random Gallery Image

Niagara Falls - Boat Lake Ontario Payam on the k2 again Baby Cockatiel Pier at lake Ontario Looks like New York Dream Catcher Pastoor Jacobs

Most Recent

lego-mohammed.jpg mbaside.jpg macessity-laptop-stand.jpg macessity-laptop-stand-messy.jpg

Calendar

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr «-»  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031